Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 SO3D 730 - Johnston v. State

Johnston v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
February 2020
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden · Atkins v. Virginia · Michel v. State of Louisiana Poret

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is a strong presumption that trial counsel’s performance was not deficient. See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 690 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 . “A fair assessment of attorney performance requires that every effort be made to eliminate the distorting effects of hindsight, to reconstruct the circumstances of counsel’s challenged conduct, and to evaluate the conduct from counsel’s perspective at the time.” Id. at 689 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 . The defendant carries the burden to “overcome the presumption that, under the circumstances, the challenged action ‘might be considered sound trial strategy.’ ” Id. (quoting Michel v. Louisiana, 350 U.S. 91, 101 , 76 S.Ct. 158 , 100 L.Ed. 83 (1955)). “Judicial scrutiny of counsel’s performance must be highly deferential.” Id. “[Strategic decisions do not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel if alternative courses have been considered and rejected and counsel’s decision was reasonable under the norms of professional conduct.” Occhicone v. State, 768 So.2d 1037, 1048 (Fla.2000). Furthermore, where this Court previously has rejected a substantive claim on the merits, counsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to make a merit-less argument. Melendez v. State, 612 So.2d 1366, 1369 (Fla.1992). In demonstrating prejudice, the defendant must show a reasonable probability that “but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in t”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “bea[t], raped, and manually strangled [her], then dragged her to a pond and left her nude, floating face down.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.