63 So. 3d 828 - Paul v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Delva · 39 So. 3d 252 - State v. Montgomery · 837 So. 2d 366 - Reed v. State · 997 So. 2d 403 - In Re Standard Instruct. in Cr. Cases No. 2007-10 · Salonko v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ny discussion of fundamental error presupposes a failure to lodge a contemporaneous objection, a fact underlying the supreme court's review in [State v. Montgomery, 39 So.3d 252 (Fla.2010) ]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Burns v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.