Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

63 So. 3d 853

Findley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2011-06-08

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2012

1 state decisions

Relies on Enno v. State · 1 So. 3d 1141 - Stokes v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2011-06-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the trial court’s order revoking probation, lifting a previous suspension of sentence, and sentencing the appellant to 36 months in prison. We remand this case to the trial court, however, to enter a corrected revocation order reflecting that at the violation hearing, the appellant admitted violating only Conditions (3) and (11) and then entered a plea of nolo con-tendere accordingly. Because the entry of the corrected order is merely a ministerial act, the appellant need not be present. See Enno v. State, 59 So.3d 149 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); Stokes v. State, 1 So.3d 1141, 1142 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).

¶2AFFIRMED and REMANDED for entry of a corrected order.

THOMAS, WETHERELL, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
/63/so3d/853 · .json · Public domain