Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 SW3D 151 - Taylor v. Commonwealth

Taylor v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2021

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

110200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Batson v. Kentucky · Giglio v. United States · Ohio v. Roberts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]ccomplices' confessions that inculpate a criminal defendant are not within a firmly rooted exception to the hearsay rule.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “particularized guarantees of trustworthiness”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.