Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 Tex. 271 - Bigham v. Talbot & Cropper

Bigham v. Talbot & Cropper’s Empirical Analysis

1885

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
4
states following
December 1935
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently December 1935 · most notably Union Pac Ry Co v. Wyler (1895), Fuller v. El Paso Times Co. (1922)

1 federal appellate · 27 state decisions

100188518901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If, however, there had been any allegations in the first amended petition in any way retaining, even as part of the cause of action therein asserted, that which was asserted by the original petition, and afterwards reasserted by the second amended petition, that would have been sufficient to prevent the running of the statute after the original petition was filed.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.