Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 U.S. 318 - Refeld v. Woodfolk

Refeld v. Woodfolk’s Empirical Analysis

63 U.S. 318 · 1859

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
July 1980
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1980 · most notably Williams v. Neely (1904), Slide & Spur Gold Mines v. Seymour (1894)

4 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

8018591860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Galloway v. Finley · Hugh Patton v. James Taylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A court of chancery regards the transfer of real property in a contract of sale and the payment of the price as correlative obligations. The one is the consideration for the other, and the one failing leaves the other without a cause.” Refeld v. Woodfolk, 22 How. 318 , 327, 16 L. Ed. 370 ; Slide & Spur Gold Mines v. Seymour, 153 U. S. 509 , 517, 14 Sup. Ct. 842 , 38 L. Ed. 802 .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.