63 Wash. 2d 421 - State v. McCoy’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 2007
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1152 · 18 U.S.C. § 1153 · 18 U.S.C. § 1161 · 18 U.S.C. § 1162 · 25 U.S.C. § 231 · 25 U.S.C. § 452 · 25 U.S.C. § 71 · 28 U.S.C. § 1360
Relies on Williams v. Lee · Cohens v. Virginia · United States v. Kagama · Shively v. Bowlby · Samuel Worcester v. The State of Georgia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The burden of proof, once the defendant has established that he is a member of a tribe having a treaty right to take fish at all “usual and accustomed grounds and stations,” is on the state to show that its regulations, which limit Indian fishing rights either as to the time or manner of fishing, are reasonable and necessary to conserve the fishery.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“And surely it was within the competency of the Nation to secure to the Indians such a remnant of the great rights they possessed as `taking fish at all usual and accustomed places.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“usual and accustomed [fishing] grounds and stations”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.