63 Wash. App. 220 - State v. Zamora’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 117 Wash. 2d 93 - State v. Kjorsvik · 94 Wash. 2d 634 - State v. Delmarter · 104 Wash. 2d 497 - State v. Smith · 14 Wash. App. 414 - State v. Harris · 56 Wash. App. 286 - State v. Lane
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Circumstantial evidence is no less reliable than direct evidence; specific criminal intent may be inferred from circumstances as a matter of logical probability.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“An additional twenty-four months shall be added to the presumptive sentence for any ranked offense involving a violation of chapter 69.50 RCW if the offense was also a violation of RCW 69.50.435.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.