Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 Wash. App. 232 - Dunning v. Paccerelli

63 Wash. App. 232 - Dunning v. Paccerelli’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
4
states following
August 2012
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently August 2012 · most notably Zamstein v. Marvasti (1997), McKinney v. State (1998)

2 federal appellate · 40 state decisions

220199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harris v. McRae · 100 Wash. 2d 660 - Rains v. State · Coverdell v. Department of Social & Health Services · 100 Wash. 2d 275 - Chambers-Castanes v. King County · 116 Wash. 2d 596 - Babcock v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he [child abuse] reporting statute is framed in terms of reasonableness.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “collateral estoppel should not be applied to judgments of dismissal, even when based on settlement agreements, since the parties could settle for myriad reasons not related to the resolution of the issues they are litigating”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “act with a reasonable good faith intent, judged in light of all the circumstances then present....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.