63 Wash. App. 480 - State v. Wiley’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
August 1998
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Angrist v. United States · United States v. Sealy, Inc. · 110 Wash. 2d 682 - State v. Scott · 69 Wash. 2d 855 - State v. Loux · 25 Wash. App. 185 - State v. Silvernail
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Issues raised for the first time on appeal ordinarily will not be considered. State v. Anderson, 58 Wn. App. 107, 110 , 791 P.2d 547 (1990). When the alleged error is that the trial court exceeded its statutory authority by imposing a sentence that is contrary to law, however, the issue may be raised on appeal for the first time. Anderson, 58 Wn. App. at 110 ; State v. Loux, 69 Wn.2d 855 , 420 P.2d 693 (1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 997 (1967). The rationale is that a trial court exceeds its jurisdiction when it imposes a sentence contrary to law, State v. Sargent, 36 Wn. App. 463, 464 , 674 P.2d 1268 (1984); State v. Silvernail, 25 Wn. App. 185, 193 , 605 P.2d 1279 , review denied, 93 Wn.2d 1021 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 843 (1980), and a party can assert for the first time on appeal the lack of trial court jurisdiction. Anderson, 58 Wn. App. at 110 ; RAP 2.5(a)(1).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.