63 Wash. App. 761 - State v. Schaffer’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 96 Wash. 2d 591 - State v. Tharp · 36 Wash. 2d 367 - State v. Goebel · 109 Wash. 2d 484 - State v. Pelkey · 40 Wash. 2d 18 - State v. Goebel · 55 Wash. App. 738 - State v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“All relevant evidence is admissible, except as limited by constitutional requirements or as otherwise provided by statute, by these rules, or by other rules or regulations applicable in the courts of this state. Evidence which is not relevant is not admissible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Grier“That the respondent Patrick J. Schaffer . . . on or about 4 December 1988, did knowingly and maliciously cause physical damage in excess of $50, to tires, the property of Jeff Syverson and Janice Krogstadt and Lisa Galster . . .[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“were slashing tires and knocking down mailboxes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.