Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 WIS 112 - Fulton v. Day

Fulton v. Day’s Empirical Analysis

1885

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
January 1936
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wight v. Rindshopf · Melchoir v. McCarty · Barnard v. Backhaus · Ætna Insurance v. Harvey · Everingham v. Meighan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The doctrine is perfectly well settled ‘that all contracts which are repugnant to justice, or founded upon an immoral consideration, or which are against the policy of the common law, or contrary to the provisions of any statute, are void/ and courts will not lend their aid to enforce them. Melchoir v. McCarty, 31 Wis. 252 ; Ætna Ins. Co. v. Harvey, 11 Wis. 394 ; Hill v. Sherwood, 3 Wis. 343 ; Wight v. Rindskopf, 43 Wis. 344 ; Barnard v. Backhaus, 52 Wis. 593 ; Everingham v. Meighan, 55 Wis. 354 ; Wiggin v. Bush, 12 Johns. (N. Y.) 306; Bell v. Leggett, 7 N. Y. 176 ; Dalrymple v. Hillenbrand, 62 N. Y. 5 ; Rice v. Maxwell, 13 Smedes & M. (Miss.) 289.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.