63 Wis. 2d 679 - Sprang v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
June 2004
most recently cited
20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 43 Wis. 2d 661 - Ernst v. State · 24 Wis. 2d 527 - State v. Nutley · 33 Wis. 2d 80 - State v. Carter · 54 Wis. 2d 100 - State v. Garner · 50 Wis. 2d 53 - Milburn v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(2) Upon the filing of such request in proper form and within the proper time the judge named in the request shall be without authority to act further in the case except to set bail if requested by the defendant. Not more than one judge can be disqualified in any action. All defendants must join in any request to substitute a judge.” The statute has since been amended by ch. 149, 1975 Wis. Laws.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““(5) The request in sub. (1) may be in the following form: “STATE OP WISCONSIN, .... County, .... Court State of Wisconsin Vs. . . . (Defendant) “Pursuant to s. 971.20 the defendant requests a substitution for the Hon. ... as judge in the above entitled action. “Dated. . . « (Signed by defendant personally)””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.