Trader v. Darrow’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 32 Cal. 3d 689 - Kumar v. Superior Court · State Ex Rel. D.S.K. v. Kasper · 186 N.J. Super. 119 - Hache v. Riley · 236 N.J. Super. 365 - Benda v. Benda · 574 So. 2d 24 - Curtis v. Curtis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it is necessary in an emergency to protect the child because the child has been subjected to or threatened with mistreatment or abuse or is otherwise neglected or dependent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the child is physically present in this state and is a child in need of aid as defined in AS 47.10.990.” This “emergency jurisdiction” provision enables”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McDow v. McDow“under statutory provisions substantially in accordance with [Chapter 50A],”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.