Navedo v. Preisser’s Empirical Analysis
630 F.2d 636 · 1980
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2000
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Craig v. Boren · Reed v. Reed · Frontiero v. Richardson · Weinberger v. Wiesenfeld · Orr v. Orr
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]ecause the state has failed to show that its gender-based classification substantially furthers the [governmental objectives of] prevention of physical injury, emotional trauma, or pregnancy caused by sexual intercourse with an older person”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.