National State Bank v. Long’s Empirical Analysis
630 F.2d 981 · 1980
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 3 district · 15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently January 2013 · most notably 38 Cal. 3d 913 - Perdue v. Crocker National Bank (1985), 11 Cal. 4th 138 - Smiley v. Citibank (1995)
19 federal appellate · 3 district · 15 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp. · Anderson Nat Bank v. Luckett · Securities & Exchange Commission v. Medical Committee for Human Rights · Davis v. Elmira Savings Bank · National Bank v. Commonwealth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[Section 1818(b)(1)] provides that the appropriate federal banking agency may initiate cease and desist proceedings against any insured bank that violates 'a law.' 12 U.S.C. 1818(b)(1). The legislative history of the Act indicates that Congress was concerned not only with federal but with state law as well, particularly as it might bear on corruption of bank officials or the financial stability of the institution. It may be that the word law’ as used in the statute is not all encompassing and may exclude matters of purely local concern. However, when state law prohibits the practice of redlining, its enforcement so directly implicates concerns in the banking field that the appropriate federal regulatory agency has jurisdiction.” National State Bank v. Long, 630 F.2d 981, 988 (3d Cir.1980). (Emphases added.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In only a few instances has Congress explicitly preempted state regulation of national banks. More commonly, it has been left to the courts to delineate the proper boundaries of federal and state supervision.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[R]egulation of banking has been one of dual [federal-state] control since the passage of the first National Bank Act in 1863.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.