Ledford v. Peeples

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Jan. 19, 2011.

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2011-01-19

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 2011

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2011-01-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1H. Lamar Mixson, David G.H. Brackett, Frank M. Lowrey, IV, Emmet J. Bondurant, Bondurant, Mixson & Elmore, LLP, Harold T. Daniel, Jr., Laurie Webb Daniel, Holland & Knight, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiffs.

¶2Richard H. Sinkfield, Catherine M. Bennett, Kristina M. Jones, Rogers & Hardin, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendants.

¶3Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

¶4BY THE COURT:

¶5A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestions of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

¶6IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.