Brown v. Ruane’s Empirical Analysis
630 F.3d 62 · 2011
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 13 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Davis v. Alaska · Chambers v. Mississippi · Washington v. Texas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) 'was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States,' or (2) 'was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.' " Brown v. Ruane , 630 F.3d 62 , 66-67 (1st Cir. 2011) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d)(1)-(2) ). A state court decision is "contrary to”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“it applies a rule that contradicts the governing law set forth in the Court's cases or if it confronts a set of facts that are materially indistinguishable from a decision of this Court and nevertheless arrives at a different result.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.