Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 630 F.3d 622 - In re Text Messaging Antitrust Litigation

In re Text Messaging Antitrust Litigation’s Empirical Analysis

630 F.3d 622 · 2010

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
July 2019
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 8 district ·

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Pullman-Standard v. Swint · Johnson v. Jones · Monsanto Company v. Spray-Rite Service Corporation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an admission by an employee of one of the conspirators”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A] complaint that merely alleges parallel behavior alleges facts that are equally consistent with an inference that the defendants are conspiring and an inference that the conditions of their market have enabled them to avoid competing without having to agree not to compete.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a]ll that we conclude at this early stage in the litigation is that the ... complaint provides a sufficiently plausible case of price fixing to warrant allowing the plaintiffs to proceed to discovery.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.