Martinez v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis
630 F.3d 693 · 2011
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · Lingenfelter v. Astrue · Lopez ex rel. Lopez v. Barnhart · Golembiewski v. Barnhart · Villano v. Astrue
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There is no explanation of which of [claimant's] statements are not entirely credible or how credible or noncredible any of them are.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The administrative law judge found that Martinez’s severe depression is well controlled by drugs — when she takes them — but ignored the fact that during manic spells Martinez had stopped taking her medications (a common consequence of mania) .... [Pjeople with serious psychiatric problems are often incapable of taking their prescribed medications consistently.” See also Howard v. Astrue, CA 09-614, 2010 WL 1372662 , , n. 2, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32623 , — ® 19, n. 2 (W.D.Okla., Mar. 9, 2010) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“It is one thing to have a bad knee; it is another thing to have a bad knee supporting a body mass index in excess of 40.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.