630 F. Supp. 756 - Yoder v. Heinold Commodities, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently February 2015
9 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · M/s Bremen v. Zapata off-Shore Company · Kerotest Mfg Co v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co · Harelson v. United States · Witherspoon v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Routine enforcement of these clauses would undercut the broad reach of a court’s personal jurisdiction over corporations that do business in many states. As in the case at hand, where the clause requires the filing of a suit in a distant state it can serve as a large deterrent to the filing of suits by consumers against large corporations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“foremost among [the] equitable considerations are the timing and circumstances surrounding the filing of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.