Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 630 F. Supp. 2d 1165 - Rouser v. White

630 F. Supp. 2d 1165 - Rouser v. White’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
June 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000C · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · United States v. Diebold, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the Larson test only applies where plaintiff has shown that the state law or action manifests a preference to some religions over others”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.