Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 630 P2D 1008 - Salud v. State

Salud v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 2005
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 2005

9 state decisions

70198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Wortham · Frink v. State · Freeman v. State · Wilson v. State · Doisher v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Generally a character trait of an accused ... is inadmissible to prove that he acted in conformity with that character trait. However, the accused may offer evidence of his good character for a character trait which is relevant to the issues being tried. Once the accused has introduced evidence of good character, the prosecution is permitted to rebut the evidence that the accused possesses that character trait. [Footnote omitted]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) Character Evidence Generally. Evidence of a person’s character or a trait of his character is not admissible for the purpose of proving that he acted in conformity therewith on a particular occasion, except: (1) Character of Accused. Evidence of a relevant trait of his character offered by an accused, or by the prosecution to rebut the same....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “demonstrated an anti-social nature or dangerous propensities posing a clear risk to the public”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.