State v. Alaska Continental Development Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
1 district · 19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 2019
1 district · 19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Miller · Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co. · United States v. Reynolds · Love v. State · H. K. Porter Company, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Cross-Appellee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(k) Costs. Costs and attorney’s fees incurred by the defendant shall not be assessed against the plaintiff, unless: (l) the taking of the property is denied, or (2) the award of the court was at least ten (10) percent larger than the amount deposited by the condemning authority or the allowance of the master from which an appeal was taken, or (3) the action was dismissed under the provisions of subdivision (i) of this rule, or (4)allowance of costs and attorney’s fees appears necessary to achieve a just and adequate compensation of the owner. Attorney’s fees allowed under this subdivision shall be commensurate with the time committed by the attorney to the case throughout the entire proceedings.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“While perjury by a witness is always a cause for concern, we do not believe, even if we were to accept the state's argument that [the opposing party's witness] committed perjury, that in this case it would rise to the level of 'the most egre gious conduct involving a corruption of the judicial process itself,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“requires a complex balancing of the various principles and techniques which are utilized in reaching the final estimate of value.”). 8 . Boucher corroborated this testimony, stating that applying the inside-outside approach to the subject properties indicated”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Doyle
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.