Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

630 S.E.2d 451

State v. Royster

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 2006

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 2006-03-02

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2008

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-03-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Defendant's motion for "Petition for Writ of Discretionary Review," which has been treated by this Court as a Petition for Writ of Certiorari, is allowed for the limited purpose of entering the following order:

¶2This case is remanded to the Warren County Superior Court with instructions to: (1) appoint a guardian ad litem, pursuant to G.S. § 1A, Rule 17(b), to represent defendant's interests until such time as the trial court determines he is competent; (2) appoint counsel for defendant; and (3) hold an evidentiary hearing on defendant's pending MAR.

¶3By order of the Court in Conference, this 2nd day of March, 2006.

/630/se2d/451 · .json · Public domain