630 So. 2d 125 - Ex Parte Crymes’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
1 district · 46 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably 778 So. 2d 199 - Hyde v. State (1998), 663 So. 2d 999 - Ex Parte Rieber (1995)
1 district · 46 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Knight v. State · Fincher v. State · 23 Ala. App. 544 - Fisher v. State · 23 Ala. App. 581 - Chessire v. State · 630 So. 2d 120 - Crymes v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In determining whether the admission of improper testimony is reversible error, this Court has stated that the reviewing court must determine whether the ‘improper admission of the evidence ... might have adversely affected the defendant’s right to a fair trial,’ and before the reviewing court can affirm a judgment based upon the ‘harmless error’ rule, that court must find conclusively that the trial court’s error did not affect the outcome of the trial or otherwise prejudice a substantial right of the defendant.””
18 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Naylor v. State · McAdory v. State““No judgment may be reversed or set aside ... on the ground of ... improper admission or rejection of evidence, ... unless in the opinion of the court to which the appeal is taken or application is made, after examination of the entire case, it should appear that the error complained of has probably injuriously affected substantial rights of the parties.””
16 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ingmire v. State · Wilson v. State“"[W]hen, after considering the record as a whole, the reviewing court is convinced that the jury's verdict was based on the overwhelming evidence of guilt and was not based on any prejudice that might have been engendered by the improperly admitted [evidence], the admission of such [evidence] is harmless error.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.