Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 630 So. 2d 154 - Cunningham v. State

630 So. 2d 154 - Cunningham v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 1996
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Tibbs v. Florida · Powers v. Ohio · Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co. · Georgia v. McCollum

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Any conflict in the evidence presented at trial was for the jury to resolve. Bennett v. State, 584 So.2d 869, 871 (Ala.Cr. App.1990). ‘The role of appellate courts is not to say what the facts are. Our role ... is to judge whether the evidence is legally sufficient to allow submission of an issue for decision to the jury.’ Bankston v. State, 358 So.2d 1040, 1042 (Ala.1978).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.