Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

630 So. 2d 581

State v. F.G.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 10, 1993

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1993-08-10

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“[t]he claim of procedural error leading up to the entry of the disposition orders does not render the dispositions”

quoted by 3 later decisions, including 638 So. 2d 515 - State v. F.G., State v. FG

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-08-10

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 2012

19 state decisions

150199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1On Motion for Rehearing and Certification

Before HUBBART, COPE and GODERICH,* JJ.PER CURIAM.

¶2We certify that we have passed on the following question of great public importance:'

whether a claimed procedural error leading up to the entry of a final disposition order in a juvenile delinquency case renders the disposition “illegal” for purposes of a State appeal under subparagraph 39.-*584069(l)(b)(5), Florida Statutes (1991). Rehearing is denied.

¶3Rehearing denied; question certified.

/630/so2d/581 · .json · Public domain