State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 1993
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Crews · United States v. Humphries · State v. Berry · State v. Lynch · State v. Simpson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Even if we were to hold the arrest improper, such an illegal arrest would not render inadmissible identification testimony arising from the ensuing lineup. State v. Lynch, 528 S.W.2d 454, 459 (Mo.App.1975). The defendant’s presence cannot be assailed as the fruit of an illegal arrest. United States v. Humphries, 636 F.2d 1172, 1181 (9th Cir.1980). See also, United States v. Crews, 445 U.S. 463 , 100 S.Ct. 1244 , 63 L.Ed.2d 537 (1980).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Fitzgerald
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.