Hicks v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 district · 14 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[T]he presence of the crowd alone ... raised no substantial security interests. The officer repotted no threatening words, acts or other intimidation from the small crowd[J ... [T]he removal of Hicks from the scene of the initial investigation transformed the detention into a seizure requiring probable cause.”). . See, e.g., Gallegos v. City of Los Angeles, 308 F.3d 987, 991 (9th Cir.2002) (”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Commonwealth v. Revere

2. “(a) A peace officer may stop any person abroad, or in a public place, who the officer has reasonable ground to suspect is committing, has committed or is about to commit a crime, and may demand the person’s name, address, business abroad and destination.” 34 . 11 Del. C. § 1903 states in pertinent part:”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Caldwell v. State

3. “point to specific and articulable facts which, taken together with all rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant the intrusion. ”)(emphasis in original). 40 . That Detective Eckerd made the stop while Sergeant Astfalk made many salient observations is of no moment. Detective Eckerd was”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State of Delaware v. Parks.