Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 631 F.2d 1059 - New York Telephone Co. v. Federal Communications Commission

New York Telephone Co. v. Federal Communications Commission’s Empirical Analysis

631 F.2d 1059 · 1980

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 5 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2024 · most notably Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Federal Communications Commission (1986), United States Telecom Ass'n v. Federal Communications Commission (2004)

23 federal appellate · 5 district · 4 state decisions

37019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Castor v. United States · Greater Boston Television Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Whdh, Inc., a Massachusettscorporation, Intervenor. Whdh, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Greater Boston Televisioncorporation, a Massachusetts Corporation, Intervenor. Charles River Civic Television, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Whdh, Inc., Boston Broadcastersinc., Intervenors. Whdh, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Boston Broadcasters, Inc., Intervenor. Greater Boston Tv Co., Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Whdh, Inc., Boston Broadcastersinc., Intervenors · United States v. Southwestern Cable Co. · Brady v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “their nature and effect are separable from and do not substantially affect”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “abrupt departure from well established practice.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he transmission of writing, signs, signals, pictures, and sounds of all kinds by aid of wire, cable, or other like connection between the points of origin and reception of such transmission, including all instrumentalities, facilities, apparatus, and services (among other things, the receipt, forwarding, and delivery of communications) incidental to such transmission."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.