Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 631 F.2d 192 - Schwingel v. Harris

Schwingel v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis

631 F.2d 192 · 1980

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
November 2023
most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently November 2023

6 federal appellate ·

12019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1381 (§ 1601 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1382 (§ 1611 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1383 (§ 1631 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 5 U.S.C. § 551 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946)

Relies on Califano v. Yamasaki · Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co. · Marcus v. Califano · Barnett v. Califano · White v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “lack of memory or understanding may be a sufficient basis for a finding of lack of fault, taking into account, as the agency’s regulations expressly require, the plaintiff’s age, comprehension, memory, and physical and mental condition; to hold otherwise would render this requirement idle.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.