Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 631 F.2d 458 - McKeldin v. Rose

McKeldin v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis

631 F.2d 458 · 1980

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably Maupin v. Smith (1986), Leroy v. Rc Marshall (1985)

18 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

2101980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Glasser v. United States · Gideon v. Wainwright · Sanders v. United States · Holloway v. Arkansas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We do not believe the quotation from Holloway indicates a departure by the Supreme Court from the procedure prescribed in Coleman. In Holloway the Court was dealing with conflicting interests arising from joint representation of three codefendants by one appointed attorney. ... [T]he Court concluded that prejudice is presumed and reversal automatic when a trial court requires joint representation over timely objection. In this context the Court stated that reversal is automatic....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(w)here the error occurs at a preliminary hearing in state proceedings and the state invokes harmless error as a reason for denying relief, a harmless error analysis is required.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.