Mays v. Balkcom’s Empirical Analysis
631 F.2d 48 · 1980
Citation profile
52
cited by 52 later decisions
2
states following
December 2004
most recently cited
21 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sandstrom v. Montana · Sanders v. United States · Beck v. United States · Wisconsin v. Illinois · Galtieri v. Wainwright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“failure to include this claim can only be considered inexcusable neglect at best and deliberate withholding of a ground for relief at worst.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(b) Successive petitions. A second or successive petition may be dismissed if the judge finds that it fails to allege new or different grounds for relief and the prior determination was on the merits or, if new and different grounds are alleged, the judge finds that the failure of the petitioner to assert those grounds in a prior petition constituted an abuse of writ.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Matthews v. Butler“brevity of time spent in consultation, without more, does not establish that counsel was ineffective”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Magill v. Dugger
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.