Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 631 F.2d 628 - Peterson v. Califano

Peterson v. Califano’s Empirical Analysis

631 F.2d 628 · 1980

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
September 2013
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently September 2013 · most notably Harper v. Bowen (1987), Evans v. Chater (1997)

16 federal appellate · 1 district ·

1501980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Califano v. Sanders · Erickson v. United States · Cappadora v. Celebrezze · Sheehan v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare · Langford v. Flemming

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “claimants ... [to] frustrate the Congressional intent 'to forestall ... belated litigation of stale eligibility claims.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “both would defeat the intent of Congress to compress the time for judicial review.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Any individual, after any final decision of the Secretary made after a hearing to which he was a party, irrespective of the amount in controversy, may obtain a review of such decision by a civil action commenced within sixty days after the mailing to him of notice of such decision or within such further time as the Secretary may allow.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.