Rowell v. Andrus’s Empirical Analysis
631 F.2d 699 · 1980
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 9 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably American Federation of Government Employees v. Block (1981), Wing v. Commissioner (1983)
18 federal appellate · 9 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Chrysler Corporation v. Brown · Johnson v. Robison · Train v. Colorado Public Interest Research Group, Inc. · Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“substantially departs from the terms or substance of the proposed rule,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“is not part of the adopted regulation and does not require the BLM offices to process all pending lease applications before the effective date of the regulation. At best this language is merely precatory and ... (does not give) rise to a cause of action requiring the issuance of leases.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rowell v. Andrus“Unless otherwise specifically provided by statute, filing of a document, required or authorized to be published by section 1505 of this title ... is sufficient to give notice of the contents of the document to a person subject to or affected by it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rowell v. Andrus
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.