Hrdlicka v. Reniff’s Empirical Analysis
631 F.3d 1044 · 2011
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Turner v. Safley · Procunier v. Martinez · Pell v. Procunier · Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. · Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners' Labor Union, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) whether the regulation is rationally related to a legitimate and neutral governmental objective; (2) whether there are alternative avenues that remain open ... to exercise the right; (3) the impact that accommodating the asserted right will have on other, guards and prisoners, and on the allocation of prison resources; and (4) whether the existence of easy and obvious alternatives indicates that the regulation is an exaggerated response by prison officials.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.