Robinson v. Sherrod’s Empirical Analysis
631 F.3d 839 · 2011
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2676 · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E · 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 702
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Bell v. Wolfish · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Carlson v. Green · Reno v. Koray
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] number of other court of .appeals cases likewise have allowed conditions of confinement to be challenged. in an action for habeas corpus, even when, as in this case ... the challenge could not affect the duration, of [the inmate’s] confinement even indirectly.” Robinson v. Sherrod, 631 F.3d 839 , 840 (7th Cir. 2011) (citations omitted) (confirming the Seventh Circuit’s”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Poree v. Collins“[t]he tort claims act doesn't authorize equitable relief. . . . [T]he Administrative Procedure Act does,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.