Olson v. Reagen’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1396 (§ 1900 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396A (§ 1902 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396B (§ 1903 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 601 (§ 401 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 602 (§ 402 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Schweiker v. Gray Panthers · Kissinger v. Halperin · Paxton v. Union National Bank · Seafarers International Union v. Stone · Norman v. St. Clair
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“task ... limited to ensuring that the Secretary did not exceed his statutory authority and that the regulation was not arbitrary or capricious.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Olson v. Norman“who would be eligible for AFDC except for an eligibility requirement used in that program that is specifically prohibited under [Medicaid].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Olson v. Norman“take[s] into account the financial responsibility”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Olson v. Norman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.