Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 631 So. 2d 167 - Green v. State

631 So. 2d 167 - Green v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

67 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably 667 So. 2d 1242 - Ballenger v. State (1995), 860 So. 2d 704 - Howell v. State (2003)

67 state decisions

280199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 503 So. 2d 803 - Wetz v. State · McFee v. State · 592 So. 2d 114 - Hansen v. State · Barnes v. State · Weathersby v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A judge is required to disqualify himself if a reasonable person, knowing all the circumstances, would harbor doubts about his impartiality.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, this Court looks at the lower court's ruling `on the last occasion when the sufficiency of the evidence was challenged.'”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) A judge should disqualify himself in a proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned, including but not limited to instances where: (d) he or his spouse, or a person within the third degree of relationship to either of them, or the spouse of such a person: (ii) is acting as a lawyer in the proceeding.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.