Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 631 So. 2d 289 - Powell v. State

631 So. 2d 289 - Powell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
February 2013
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently February 2013

23 state decisions

130199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Blockburger v. United States · United States v. Dixon · Iannelli v. United States · Cherek v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'To be timely, a motion for mistrial must be made "immediately after the question or questions are asked that are the grounds made the basis of the motion for the mistrial.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “because under the test established in Blockburger v. United States , 284 U.S. 299 , 52 S.Ct. 180 , 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932), and recently reaffirmed by a plurality of the United States Supreme Court as the sole criterion for judging double jeopardy claims in United States v. Dixon , ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 2849 , 125 L.Ed.2d 556 (1993), each offense required proof of a statutory element that the other did not.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Id. The court held that these comments were plain error and that they adversely affected the appellant's substantial right not to be compelled to give evidence against himself, citing Ala. Const. Art. I, § 6. The court noted that, with these last comments,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.