Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

631 So. 2d 359

E.V.V. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 8, 1994

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1994-02-08

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Arizona v. Youngblood · 246 So. 2d 771 - Richardson v. State

Decided 1994-02-08

PER CURIAM.

¶1E.V.V. appeals an order adjudicating him delinquent for theft. We conclude (a) that there was no violation of the best evidence rule, § 90.952, Fla.Stat. (1991); (b) that there was no abuse of discretion with respect to the Richardson1 hearing; (c) that there was no Brady2 violation, see Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51, 109 S.Ct. 333, 102 L.Ed.2d *360281 (1988); and (d) that the motion for judgment of acquittal was properly denied.

¶2Affirmed.

¶3. Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971).

¶4. Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963).

/631/so2d/359 · .json · Public domain