¶1E.V.V. appeals an order adjudicating him delinquent for theft. We conclude (a) that there was no violation of the best evidence rule, § 90.952, Fla.Stat. (1991); (b) that there was no abuse of discretion with respect to the Richardson
¶2Affirmed.
¶3. Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971).
¶4. Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963).