631 So. 2d 730 - State v. Laroux’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 2013
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 616 So. 2d 1353 - State v. Fontenot · 614 So. 2d 788 - State v. Brooks · State v. Brooks · State v. Hawkins · 622 So. 2d 1199 - State v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Guidelines and the 1991 implementing legislation adopt the view that a sentence in a particular case, which is acceptable to the prosecutor, defense counsel, and the trial court, should not be subjected to scrutiny by a reviewing court. [Footnotes omitted.] Inasmuch as the state, the defendant, and the trial court all agreed to the 30-year sentencing”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a]bsent some compelling circumstances not present here, a defendant who agrees to be sentenced within the limits of a sentencing cap cannot later appeal his sentence as excessive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The defendant cannot appeal or seek review of a sentence imposed in conformity with a plea agreement which was set forth in the record at the time of the plea.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.