Lee v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently November 2014
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Moran v. Burbine · 598 So. 2d 731 - Balfour v. State · 517 So. 2d 1383 - Reuben v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`Determining whether a confession is admissible is a finding of fact which is not disturbed unless the trial judge applied an incorrect legal standard, committed manifest error, or the decision was contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence.'”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage“[S]uch a rule would be contrary to the clear implication of both federal and state cases.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A rule allowing third parties to invoke individual constitutional rights is not required by federal case law nor was such announced in Reuben or any other Mississippi case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.