Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 631 SW2D 121 - State v. Estes

State v. Estes’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 1989
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Royal · State v. Davis · State v. Blake · State v. Patterson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The prejudice in turn depends upon the nature of the charge, the evidence presented, and the role the undisclosed testimony would likely have played in the preparation of a defense. If the evidence was not of such a character as to raise a reasonable likelihood that its pri- or discovery would have affected the result of the trial, there is no error in failing to impose sanctions for its nondisclosure.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.