United States v. Basso’s Empirical Analysis
632 F.2d 1007 · 1980
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently October 2013
11 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2680
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Morrissey v. Brewer · Aguilar v. Texas · Payton v. New York · Spinelli v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Basso’s susceptibility to arrest and revocation of probation has not ceased or been mooted because more than two years have passed since he was placed on two years’ probation on January 14, 1977. The probation statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3653 , explicitly provides, “At any time within the probation period, or within the maximum probation period permitted by section 3651 of this title ¡five years], the court ... may issue a warrant for [a probationer’s] arrest for violation of probation occurring during the probation period.” (Emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“(a)t any time within the probation period, or within the maximum probation period permitted by section 3651 of this title (5 years), the (district) court ... may issue a warrant for (probationer's) arrest for violation of probation occurring during the probationary period.... (T)he court may revoke the probation and require (the probationer) to serve the sentence imposed”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.