Outing v. Bell’s Empirical Analysis
632 F.2d 1144 · 1980
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
September 1986
most recently cited
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Cruz v. Hauck · Dorszynski v. United States · Parham v. Cortese · Harvin v. United States · Abernathy v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Committed youth offenders not conditionally released shall undergo treatment in institutions of maximum security, medium security, or minimum security types, including training schools, hospitals, farms, forestry and other camps, and other agencies that will provide the essential varieties of treatment. The Director shall from time to time designate, set aside, and adapt institutions and agencies under the control of the Department of Justice for treatment. Insofar as practical, such institutions and agencies shall be used only for treatment of committed youth offenders, and such youth offenders shall be segregated from other offenders, and classes of committed youth offenders shall be segregated according to their needs for treatment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ralston v. Robinson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.