United States v. Caicedo-Asprilla’s Empirical Analysis
632 F.2d 1161 · 1980
Citation profile
20 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 14 U.S.C. § 89 · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 952 · 28 U.S.C. § 144
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Simmons v. United States · Griffin v. California · United States v. Radio Television News Directors Ass'n · Cruz v. Hauck
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[C]ircumstantial evidence may be used to prove a conspiracy without ever showing the existence of any formal agreement...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“was insufficient to instruct the jury on the availability of that defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.