Marsh v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
632 F.2d 296 · 1980
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 6 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently May 2021 · most notably Cook v. Heckler (1986), Walker v. Harris (1981)
8 federal appellate · 6 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Laws v. Celebrezze · Gold v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare · Head v. New Mexico Board of Examiners in Optometry · Cutler v. Weinberger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where the ALJ fails in his duty to fully inquire into the issues necessary for adequate development of the record, and such failure is prejudicial to the claimant, the case should be remanded.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Benthall v. Shalala
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.