Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 632 F.2d 605 - Holloway v. McElroy

Holloway v. McElroy’s Empirical Analysis

632 F.2d 605 · 1980

Citation profile

154
cited by 154 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

84 federal appellate · 2 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 154 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2016 · most notably Engle v. Isaac (1982), United States v. Tresvant (1982)

84 federal appellate · 2 district · 10 state decisions

12501980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Chapman v. State of California · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Wainwright v. Sykes · Burks v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 154 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(I)f neither the state legislature nor the state courts indicate that a federal constitutional claim is barred by some state procedural rule, a federal court implies no disrespect for the State by entertaining the claim.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “(a) A person commits the offense of murder when he unlawfully and with malice aforethought, either express or implied, causes the death of another human being. (b) Express malice is that deliberate intention unlawfully to take the life of another human being which is manifested by external circumstances capable of proof. Malice shall be implied where no considerable provocation appears and where all the circumstances of the killing show an abandoned and malignant heart.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he state may not place the burden of persuasion on [an] issue upon the defendant if the truth of the `defense' would necessarily negate an essential element of the crime charged.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.